Illiberal Construction of pro Se Pleadings
نویسنده
چکیده
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................586 I. PRO SE LITIGATION AND LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION .......................589 A. The Right to Proceed Pro Se ............................................... 590 B. The Federal Pro Se Docket .................................................. 591 1. Evidence of a Burgeoning Caseload ......................591 2. Reasons Litigants Represent Themselves...............593 3. Challenges Facing Pro Se Litigants ........................597 C. Liberal Construction ......................................................... 600 1. The Method by Which Courts Liberally Construe Pro Se Complaints ..................................601 2. The Theory Behind Liberal Construction .............604 II. PLAUSIBILITY AND PRO SE PLEADINGS ...........................................607 A. Ashcroft v. Iqbal ............................................................ 608 1. Background and Prior History ...............................608 2. The Supreme Court’s Two-Pronged Approach .....609 B. Iqbal’s Impact on Pro Se Pleadings .................................... 612 1. The Minimal Assurance Provided Pro Se Litigants by Erickson v. Pardus .................................613 2. Iqbal’s Exceptional Hostility Toward Pro Se Complaints ..............................................................617 3. Explanations for the Disproportionate Increase in Pro Se Dismissals ..................................619
منابع مشابه
1. Introduction: illiberal democracy in Hungary?
In social sciences literature, numerous attempts have been made to capture the political essence and features of Hungary’s ‘illiberal’ regime but few were aimed at analyzing specific public policy fields in the illiberal democracy. This paper analyses the cultural policy of the Orbán regime, focusing on the role of ideology. A qualitative case study based on document analysis looks at the legit...
متن کاملThe Global Importance of Illiberal Moderates
In contrast to the claim that the most significant fault line in contemporary global affairs is between the civilisation of the West and all others, this essay argues that the schism between those who advance their values through violence and those who rely on persuasion, both of which are present in all civilisations, is the greatest source of conflict in the post-Cold-War era. Moderates come ...
متن کاملHow to Buy a Porsche: An Approach to Defeasible Decision Making Preliminary Report
In the Zeno project at GMD, we are investigating computational models of decision making in groups. In the spirit of the Pleadings Game [6], we are planning to implement a mediating system for decision making procedures. The purpose of the system is to regulate the rights and obligations of each group member in the process of decision making, to identify illegal moves in the language game, and ...
متن کاملNeoliberalism 4.0: The Rise of Illiberal Capitalism; Comment on “How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention”
Neoliberal logic and institutional lethargy may well explain part of the reason why governments pay little attention to how their economic and development policies negatively affect health outcomes associated with the global diffusion of unhealthy commodities. In calling attention to this the authors encourage health advocates to consider strategies other than just regu...
متن کاملA Formal Model of Adjudication
This article presents a formal dialogue game for adjudication dialogues. Existing AI & law models of legal dialogues and argumentation-theoretic models of persuasion are extended with a neutral third party, to give a more realistic account of the adjudicator’s role in legal procedures. The main feature of the model is a division into a pleadings phase, where the adversaries plea their case and ...
متن کامل